<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neotropical Birding &#187; Red-throated Wood-rail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neotropicbirding.com/blog/tag/red-throated-wood-rail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neotropicbirding.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:44:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Second Chances: Rediscovering Lost and Extinct Birds I</title>
		<link>http://neotropicbirding.com/blog/2009/10/17/second-chances-rediscovering-lost-and-extinct-birds-i/</link>
		<comments>http://neotropicbirding.com/blog/2009/10/17/second-chances-rediscovering-lost-and-extinct-birds-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jean Paul Perret</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banggai Crow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Crested Tern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coopery Thorntail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extinct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji Petrel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gray-necked Wood-rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivory-billed Woodpecker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaempfer's Woodpecker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kalinowski's Tinamou]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masked Booby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ornate Tinamou]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red-throated Wood-rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rediscover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasman Booby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White-masked Antbird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neotropicalbirding.wordpress.com/2009/10/17/second-chances-rediscovering-lost-and-extinct-birds-i/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When I started writing this post I spent a couple of days reading articles and taking notes about the subject. At the end of the day I had too much information to be included in a single posting. I have therefore decided to launch a series that will be divided into three parts. In Part [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><font color="#808080" size="2" face="Arial">When I started writing this post I spent a couple of days reading articles and taking notes about the subject. At the end of the day I had too much information to be included in a single posting. I have therefore decided to launch a series that will be divided into three parts. In Part I I will talk about the reasons why a species once thought extinct, returns. Part II will be an historical account of some species of birds from Peru, the Neotropical region and the world that at some point were &quot;lost&quot; or considered extinct. Finally, in Part III I will discuss bird species in the Neotropical region that are considered lost species waiting to be rediscovered.</font> </i></p>
<p><b><font size="2" face="Arial">Part I: Why we Rediscover Lost and Extinct Birds?</font></b></p>
<p><b></b></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial">In recent months we have witnessed the rediscovery of two species of birds thought to be extinct – the <a href="http://www.birdlife.org/news/news/2009/09/fiji_petrel_discovery.html" target="_blank">Fiji Petrel</a> and the <a href="http://www.livescience.com/animals/091013-rediscovered-crow.html" target="_blank">Banggai Crow</a>. How it is possible that a species believed to be extinct is rediscovered?<font size="2" face="Arial"><a href="http://neotropicalbirding.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/philadelphiaacademyofnaturalsciencesbilltacular.jpg"><img style="border-width:0;" title="Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences Billtacular" border="0" alt="Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences Billtacular" align="right" src="http://neotropicalbirding.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/philadelphiaacademyofnaturalsciencesbilltacular_thumb.jpg" width="226" height="337" /></a></font></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial">One explanation for the rediscovery of bird species relates to the way that many species are initially described, using the skins of birds collected by naturalists during the nineteenth and early twentieth century. Many of these skins were not immediately reviewed when collected and have remained in storage, unstudied for decades. Only when a researcher takes these specimens out years later are new species recognized. This happened with <a href="http://www.birdlife.org/news/news/2006/12/caatinga_woodpecker_redisc.html" target="_blank">Kaempfer&#8217;s (Caatinga) Woodpecker</a>, collected in 1926, recognized as a sub species in 1973 and then <a href="http://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCProp59.html" target="_blank">elevated to species in 2003</a>. In the more than seventy years that elapsed between collection and description of the species, it was believed that the species had become extinct until the first wild population of this newly recognized species was rediscovered in 2006.&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; </font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial">Another reason behind the rediscovery of species is that museums sometimes have skins that are not properly labeled or the true geographic origins of the species are vague or unknown. A good example of this is the case of the <a href="http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/species/index.html?action=SpcHTMDetails.asp&amp;sid=1876&amp;m=0" target="_blank">Coppery Thorntail</a>, known from two skins collected in 1852 <i>somewhere</i> in Bolivia. This lack of geographic detail as well as the fact that Bolivian boundaries have changed greatly since the time of collection has resulted in the fact that no person has yet seen this species in its habitat. However, the door is open for the possibility of rediscovery.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial">Confusion about the existence of certain species also arises when there are few specimens available for study. Scientists are challenged to classify whether these rare museum specimens truly represent a distinct species or if they are hybrids of other species. This happened with the White-masked Antibird. Scientists had been doubtful about the existence of the White-masked Antibird until it was <a href="http://www.museum.lsu.edu/lane/Lane%20et%20al.%20Pithys.pdf" target="_blank">recently rediscovered in Peru</a>. </font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial">A slightly different scenario than rediscovering a species after it has been labeled extinct is recognizing that an ‘extinct’ species cannot be found because it never existed. Some ‘new’ species have been misidentified and are actually part of an extant species. This is the case with the Red-throated Wood-rail of Peru that went from being considered an extinct species to being dubious taxa by the SACC</font><font size="2" face="Arial">. The supposed <a href="http://www.birdlifeforums.org/WebX/.2cba66eb" target="_blank">Red-throated Wood-rail is now believed to be a poorly preserved specimen of the Gray-necked Wood-rail</a></font><font size="2" face="Arial">. Something similar happened with the Kalinowski&#8217;s Tinamou, of which all trace was lost for nearly 100 years until it was &quot;rediscovered&quot; in 2000. However, upon rediscovery, the SACC deemed that this species designation wasn’t valid; the <a href="http://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCprop246.html" target="_blank">Kalinowski’s Tinamou is now regarded as a synonym of Ornate Tinamou</a>, another species that lives in Peru</font><font size="2" face="Arial">. A similar occurrence happened in the case of the <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/08/090811-extinct-booby-masked.html" target="_blank">Tasman Booby</a>, which was believed extinct and now known to be a subspecies of Masked Booby. </font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial">In other instances, species that were collected, studied and described as new species in the nineteenth century remain in oblivion because their area of distribution encompasses very remote or inaccessible places where there are no people with the knowledge to identify them in the field. This happened with the <a href="http://www.birdlife.org/news/news/2009/09/fiji_petrel_discovery.html" target="_blank">Fiji Petrel</a> rediscovered this year and the <a href="http://www.orientalbirdclub.org/publications/bullfeats/chincres.html" target="_blank">Chinese Crested Tern rediscovered in 2000</a> in an inaccessible military zone between China and Taiwan. These species were never really missing or extinct; it is just that people with the knowledge to identify these birds had not traveled to these remote or inaccessible areas. </font></p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://neotropicalbirding.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/chinesecrestedterndotcool.jpg"><img style="border-width:0;" title="Chinese Crested Tern dotcool" border="0" alt="Chinese Crested Tern dotcool" src="http://neotropicalbirding.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/chinesecrestedterndotcool_thumb.jpg" width="502" height="335" /></a> </p>
<p align="center"><font color="#808080" size="1" face="Arial"><em>Chinese Crested Tern </em></font><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dotcool/" target="_blank"><font color="#808080" size="1" face="Arial"><em>© PeiWen Chang</em></font></a><b><font color="#808080" size="1" face="Arial"><em> </em></font></b></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial">Additionally, some birds are naturally shy and only came out at dawn or night. This was the case with the Imperial Snipe, described in 1869 from a single specimen obtained from the Andes in the vicinity of Bogota, Colombia. <a href="http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v089n03/p0497-p0505.pdf" target="_blank">It was not seen again until 1967 when it was found in Peru by John Terborgh</a>. There is also the possibility that two bird species can look very much alike, thus making them hard to distinguish in the field. For example, when <a href="http://www.birdlife.org/news/news/2006/06/becks_petrel.html" target="_blan<br />
k">Beck’s Petrel was rediscovered</a>, the <i>Birds Australia Rarities Committee,</i> having pictures in hand, rejected the bird’s identity because they couldn’t separate this from the Tahiti’s Petrel. </font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial">Finally, sometimes a species has become so rare due to hunting, habitat loss or natural reasons, that it becomes almost impossible to find. This may be the case with the controversial Ivory-billed Woodpecker. It was <a href="http://www.birds.cornell.edu/ivory/evidence/ScienceArticle05.pdf" target="_blank">rediscovered in 2004</a> in the Big Woods area of Arkansas. Although there have been intensive searches throughout the region, until now there is no undisputed record about the species’ survival and the status of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker remains undetermined. </font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial">Regardless of the amazement and joy at rediscovering a species that was once thought lost, these birds still need extensive protection. Usually these species are critically endangered and need a lot of attention from governments and bird advocates to survive in the long term. Through these rediscoveries nature has given us a second chance and we must do all that is possible to conserve these and other endangered birds as well as their habitats.</font></p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://neotropicalbirding.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/carolinaparakeetap2il.jpg"><img style="border-width:0;" title="carolina parakeet ap2il" border="0" alt="carolina parakeet ap2il" src="http://neotropicalbirding.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/carolinaparakeetap2il_thumb.jpg" width="502" height="377" /></a>&#160;</p>
<p align="center"><font color="#808080" size="1" face="Arial"><em>There isn’t a second chance for the Carolina Parakeet, it became extinct in 1918</em></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial">In Part II of this series I&#8217;ll examine a case by case account of the latest species that have been rediscovered in Peru, the Neotropical region and the world.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial"><i></i></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><font color="#404040" face="Arial"><em>All photos under Creative Commons License: </em></font><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ap2il/" target="_blank"><font color="#404040" face="Arial"><em>Carolina Parakeet photo</em></font></a><font face="Arial"><em><font color="#404040">, </font><font size="1"><font color="#808080"><font color="#404040"><font size="2">Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences photo </font><font size="2"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/billysbirds/" target="_blank">© Bill Lynch</a></font></font>&#160;</font></font></em></font></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial">&#160;</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial"></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial"></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial"></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neotropicbirding.com/blog/2009/10/17/second-chances-rediscovering-lost-and-extinct-birds-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

